The 5-Second Trick For cisg goverving law cases

The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.

Its enforcement with the provision of capital punishment or life imprisonment underscores the value of human life along with the importance of maintaining regulation and order in society.

These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and contain all notable cases decided through the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Given the legal analysis on the topic issue, we have been in the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally sound, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're subject to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion might be viewed as, however, we have been apparent within our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, matter to availability of vacancy topic towards the approval of the competent authority.

139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Presented the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been from the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally audio, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are issue to rules and regulations Should the recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case in the petitioners for promotion can be deemed, however, we've been obvious in our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy matter into the approval from the competent authority.

The case addresses An array of issues together with, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation of your right to life.

(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August 28th, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government agencies in regards to projects that could probably pose a public risk. This case is also noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all upcoming public interest litigation introduced before courts for environmental protection.” To cite just trespass to land case law one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found in the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination is usually a right to life itself.

whether although granting promotion senior employees were thought of for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)

This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances in the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 with the Constitution. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Presented the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been in the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally audio, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are matter to rules and regulations In the event the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case of your petitioners for promotion can be deemed, however, we have been obvious in our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, subject to availability of vacancy topic to the approval in the competent authority.

Finally, an important contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration because of the Court under Article 184 (three), is setting a precedent which allows for much easier access for the public to approach the superior courts as well as subordinate courts on environment related issues.

The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its probable to protected economic interests and maintain the integrity of the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, a comprehensive grasp of such changes is significant for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a strong legal system.

What's more, it addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and a hundred and twenty on the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more

P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to watch that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are thoroughly different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case legislation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held via the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--